I just lost me entire Verb post and I'm about to lose it. Time to write it again

 

26 minutes ago, Zander? said:

 

I have thoughts, unfortunately it may fringe on Mafia taboo I wonder if we're prolly thinking the same Shad?

 

Don't elaborate on what it is just if you think it is

Just now, Lenlo said:

I just lost me entire Verb post and I'm about to lose it. Time to write it again

 

 

If you're a Villager it's DMs way of punishing you for ever doubting my Majestic Holy VILLAGERYNESS!!!!!!   Lololololol

 

35 minutes ago, Zander? said:

 

Anyone whose more familiar with RTE, is this apparent lack of empathy and straightforwardness alignment indictive for RTE?!?!!!  I know some people just say whatever they feel regardless of others. It feels to me more Wolfy but maybe RTE is just StoneCold lol 

 

I dont remember to be honest.

 

23 minutes ago, Zander? said:

 

Well Dice take your time I don't expect a 100 year old man to move , read or be very fast..... lololololol 

 

*Runs*

 

Pegs a baseball at Zanders head as he runs

 

20 minutes ago, Zander? said:

 

You think Cairos posts sounds fake?  Just want to confirm I'm following.  And you still think RTE is Scum....and it's a Gambit....so it's #thewheelsonthebus between them iyo?

 

thats what im considering. Im by no means certain tho

 

13 minutes ago, Zander? said:

 

I honestly don't recall this or his alignments In any Mafia game I've played with our boy besides last game, but please elaborate for me so I can better try and get there.

 

I havent played enough games with him to have mafia meta on Cairos. Im just reading the Cairos Ive known for years as far as tone goes. Im basically saying if hes town he needs to show it because besides that fake feeling town, he hasnt really dug in to anything other then RTE yet that I can think of.  Theres nothing that makes me go "That sounds town!"

  

  Ok I have to speed run this because I lost the original and god I'm annoyed lol.

Spoiler

On 3/11/2025 at 9:22 AM, Verbal32 said:

D1 town on town violence callout?  Know who likes to do that?  

 

And hedging a sus in case you're wrong?  How do you know it's not a joke vote?

 

Interesting.

 

Agree to disagree - he went straight for low hanging fruit.  That's as scummy as it gets, especially this early.

 

Cute play on words notwithstanding, how am I good so far?  I think this post is my first game-related one, yes?

 

Heh, that's fair.  I was actually one of the main admins on this site for about 10 years, but I'm now retired from that and am a simple mod now.

Still bothers me, he and everyone else should know that this was a light read for how early in D1 it was, no one was locking both as villagers, just giving out light reads to get the game going. Yet Verb jumps down my throat about it, votes me, accuses me of going for low hanging fruit and then... Never really pushes me or brings me up again? Keep this in mind, because this lack of any real pushing/casing will be relevant later.

 

On 3/11/2025 at 12:17 PM, Verbal32 said:

 

I love you for saying this.  This was always my issue with the "newer" crowd when they invaded DM Mafia with the spam and crazy talk about being cleared super early and town cores and all that.  It's just spam this early, and it's done so that when scum it can be used as cover.

 

There were a lot of players like me that would come back to the thread and see 20+ new pages and just give up and go along with the crowd, forever in perpetual catch-up mode.  It's why I stopped playing larger games and only played ones like this - small enough to keep up.  Imagine when Zander is the 4th highest poster in a game.  I wanted to go dodge traffic, heh.

On 3/11/2025 at 12:20 PM, Verbal32 said:

 

Isn't it kind of the same thing?  If he "takes the lead" in posting and calling himself town (and others), to me that's the same thing.

Some meta/playstyle conversations, keep this in mind as well, as this will become the bulk of his content.

 

On 3/11/2025 at 1:58 PM, Verbal32 said:

(feels like off-topic at this point, but it's really on-topic lol)

 

Lenlo

Zander

???

 

There's part of your scum team.  Thank me later.

Here we get his first, and only, scum list where he lists me and Zander (This is in the middle of our spat) as wolves. No support, no nothing. Me I get, even if his reasoning is bad at least he has a reason and has voted me. But Zander? He hasn't mentioned anything about him at all, but this list seems to imply we are wolves together. He even later clarifies that he added the ??? because there are 3 scum in the game, so he clearly intends this as a list and not a "One or the other", as shown in the quotes below.

12 hours ago, Verbal32 said:

 

What does me being nitpicky on verbiage have to do with being scum?

 

The post with the ??? was because I know there are 3 scum and I only listed 2 potentials....so the 3rd is a complete unknown and therefore reflected with a ???

On 3/11/2025 at 7:39 PM, Verbal32 said:

 

It was a blank for the other scum player, sorry!

 

I have no problem admitting that I understood almost nothing from that paragraph.

 

By giving my early scum reads?  What were you expecting?

 

Ouch, that's a ping from you, Zander.  Townies are willing to work with "bad" reads, only Sithscum deal in absolutes.

This is where things get interesting. This is his first ping against Zander, his first criticism of Zanders play at all, and it comes after he has added Zander to his scum list. So if this is his first  criticism... Why is Zander on the list? Why is he considering Zander a wolf? Again, me I get, even if he's wrong he has a reason. But here, it's like he just took the two people arguing and said "Screw it, both" and started justifying it after. At best it's lazy town, at worst it's a wolf setting up consecutive mislynch targets.

 

On 3/12/2025 at 11:26 AM, Verbal32 said:

 

Exactly this last sentence.  It's not a bad idea to lynch from the two of them today and learn a ton going into D2.  Is the scum team just watching this?  Lynch one, watch the other, profit.

 

Yes.  Maybe not the plot piece, but you most definitely have a plan each game.

This is where we see the reasoning behind it and he lays out his plan for lynching either one of us, he doesnt mention a preference but I assume me since he's voting me, would be nice to see him case/try to push it though if he really believed in it. What's weird to me though is that despite listing us both as scum, he makes no mention of actually trying to... catch scum. Only of the information we will get when one of us flips and we can watch the other, mentioning what may happen if scum are only watching everything go down. Which is weird, because he thinks me and/or Zander are scum... right?

 

Ignore the watcher confusion, that gets clarified later and I don't blame him that mistake, clearly a knowledge check that's all.

 

On 3/12/2025 at 11:30 AM, Verbal32 said:

 

When Zander is not pressured as town, he's actually quite useful.  But when he gets pressure, which happens from time to time, he goes into the mode he's currently in (i.e. frantic vibes) and drowns himself out.

Talkin about Zander's meta.

 

On 3/12/2025 at 11:31 AM, Verbal32 said:

 

This is at least the 2nd time you've referenced Zander as the vig.  How have you arrived at that?  Is it just his post where he mentioned vengeance or something?

This is actually a good catch, he's not wrong, we've all acknowledged that the RTE vig thing was weird, so good on him.

 

On 3/12/2025 at 11:34 AM, Verbal32 said:

 

Eh, don't worry about win rate discussions.  My win rate on DM is probably amazing (I used to win all the time maybe 15-18 years ago, but that means absolutely nothing.  I'm still prone to play like a moron and be lolverbal.

On 3/12/2025 at 11:36 AM, Verbal32 said:

 

Don't we have a watcher and not a cop?  Or am I remembering the setup incorrectly?

 

Absolutely possible, yes.  This is why I like the idea of lynching one and having our watcher (or whatever town investigative role we have) peek the other.

On 3/12/2025 at 11:50 AM, Verbal32 said:

 

I hear ya.  It's just his playstyle, as you well know.  Honestly, I skim Zander early in games, but read him closely later on.

More meta, figuring out the watcher mistake. Only real bit of substance is he mentions only skimming Zander early in games, but again, he has Zander on his scum list with me so... Is he skimming and wolf reading him? Or did he just pick the two people arguing, not care what they were and decide "Information" was the goal?

 

Spoiler

On 3/12/2025 at 11:54 AM, Verbal32 said:

 

Hate to agree with him here, but it is NAI right now.  That said, I think he's painted himself into a corner with Lenlo and I do think we should lynch in that duo for D1.

 

We should be able to piece it together reasonably well.  For example, if the mafia and vig both shoot, the vig would likely reveal that next day and we could use that info properly.  Scum would be unlikely to counter as it would be easy to just lynch them and test.

On 3/12/2025 at 11:57 AM, Verbal32 said:

 

My persona on JN is very different than my persona here.  JN has much less code of conduct rules and we are pretty nasty to each other, but it's done with respect and humor.

 

When that happens here, it gets nasty and nonproductive.  Basically, it's because we're all book nerds here, and JN is a jocky sports site, lol.

On 3/12/2025 at 12:03 PM, Verbal32 said:

 

Those aren't bad odds for D1, broseph.

On 3/12/2025 at 12:06 PM, Verbal32 said:

 

I have a question on that role.  If the watcher "watches" a scum team member, will they see that person visit another for the scum team's factional NK?  Does the scum team pick a player to perform the NK and the watcher can only get info by watching that specific scum team member?

 

 

On 3/12/2025 at 12:07 PM, Verbal32 said:

 

This is where ISOing you becomes a chore that most won't bother with.  It lets you skate on  stuff you've said previously, which also tends to make people want you dead early (i.e. less work later, heh).

 

Just sayin'.

On 3/12/2025 at 12:11 PM, Verbal32 said:

 

Crap, I swapped watcher & tracker.  Ok, if the watcher watches player X, who is scum, how will their results play out?  Does the factional NK contain only 1 person at random from the scum team, or do they nominate who will show on any watch?

On 3/12/2025 at 12:12 PM, Verbal32 said:

 

The dead early thing may contain my personal bias, heh.

On 3/12/2025 at 4:22 PM, Verbal32 said:

 

I feel your pain, I'm the one who gets joke lynched over the weekend (when I almost never post) on JN for the lulz.  I chuckle sometimes, and want to rip their faces off other times, heh.

On 3/12/2025 at 5:20 PM, Verbal32 said:

 

What is "gut meta" supposed to mean?

On 3/12/2025 at 6:18 PM, Verbal32 said:

Ah, ok.  I think we just use the term meta differently.  So you're saying you're a "gut player" and not an "analytical player".

 

Meta is what works, aka the "most effective tactics available", or what playstyle is working best at the time.  So, your meta is to use your gut to read players.  Cool beans, I can get down with that.

13 hours ago, Verbal32 said:

 

I'm not caught up yet, but want to address this.  You don't have to explain how DM defines meta - I'm literally the longest standing mafia player on the site, heh.  I played here before the word was even used.  Now get off my lawn!  😉

 

But really, we're saying the same thing.  The acronym means what I said it means - DM has just tweaked it a little to mean "playstyle", but it's really more "playstyle that works for that person"...aka most effective tactic.

 

Tomato, tomahto, right?

13 hours ago, Verbal32 said:

 

I literally had all the investigative roles in my head jumbled up while posting that idea.  I didn't want to correct it, so I decided to leave it alone and see how people responded to it.

 

It gave me a negative one about myself, heh.

 

I don't understand what you mean.

I moved it into a second spoiler to save space, but man it's just... so much meta/non game talk. Dudes figuring out the watcher role, again, don't blame him for that. But I'd really love to see some casing or pressuring or reinforcing of reads or something. Instead its like hes just coming off busy?

 

 

13 hours ago, Verbal32 said:

Also, did Shad just hop into Zander's pocket?

13 hours ago, Verbal32 said:

 

Can I assume you're joking about a "D1 pass"?  Please say you are.

13 hours ago, Verbal32 said:

Because if you're town and Shad isn't, he just pocketed you and you just basically explained why above.

Brings up the pockets, valid, but again he's considering "If you're town" with Zander, and as we see from the post below that comes after, he's still keeping to his original scum list of me/Zander. What I'm getting at is, I dont think he really believes that list at this point, he only picked the two people butting heads because they were easy/obvious targets, and now it feels like he's kind of hedging his bets.

12 hours ago, Verbal32 said:

 

What does me being nitpicky on verbiage have to do with being scum?

 

The post with the ??? was because I know there are 3 scum and I only listed 2 potentials....so the 3rd is a complete unknown and therefore reflected with a ???

 

 

13 hours ago, Verbal32 said:

@Shad_

 

Scenario:  there are 2 players, and you think one of them is potentially scum.  You plan to lynch one and cop the other.  Good or bad idea?

 

(don't take this game's roles into consideration - only the scenario above, please)

Weird hypothetical that he never really gets back to, feels like he's just appearing busy/engaged without really contributing anything. Like what is this for if you're not going to bring it back up/explain why you asked?

 

Spoiler

13 hours ago, Verbal32 said:

 

I have zero experience with you, so I'm inclined to think you mixed me up with somebody else's post.

12 hours ago, Verbal32 said:

 

Regardless of your alignment this game, what you see is a fundamental difference in how the game is played.  You and I come from a time when wagonomics and analysis (obv useless D1) was the primary driving force on scumhunting.  You can see this method work wonders in the first few seasons of the mafia championship.

 

Then a newer crowd came in and played differently.  I'm not saying it's better or worse, just different.  That's where the "lock clear" and "D1 pass" and "tone" come from.  For a player like me, it's impossible to align with that type of alternative style, and it always rubs me the wrong way.

 

All that said, that's a me problem, and maybe doesn't apply to you.  Part of the reason I'm playing again is I'm trying to better understand and work with this other style that I admittedly hate so much.  I'm too stubborn and I'm trying to fix that.

11 hours ago, Verbal32 said:

 

I like this answer, thank you.

11 hours ago, Verbal32 said:

 

Don't let yourself fall into the trap of thinking the second style doesn't work, or isn't well-informed.  I did that at first, and players like Cory and Clov showed me it can be done well (just like the older style).  Maybe things improve with time, who knows.  Maybe my method is outdated and I need to adopt a different style.  I know guys like Shad and AJ then came and kicked some @$$ with that second style and won plenty of games.  So it works.

11 hours ago, Verbal32 said:

 

I'm curious about the case syntax as well there.  And for me, I have no idea what my meta would be now - it's been too long.  I think I used to be better at being scum/3p, and barely average at being town.  I'd venture that I'm probably average now as scum, and pretty crap at being town now, heh.

11 hours ago, Verbal32 said:

 

We're playing the game that's literally referred to as an internet game of Guess Who.  heh

 

Even more meta and playstyle talk. He's talked more about meta and playstyle and out of game stuff than the actual game. What little of this game he has talked about, he hasn't backed up or supported in any way. He's still sticking to this Zander/Lenlo/??? team, but he acts as though the only thing we will get out of it is information from the lynch/watcher, not actually catching a wolf, like he doesn't actually expect us to. If he did, why would he not case either of us? Not push our lynch? Hell, why not push my lynch, he's certainly been voting me the entire game since he grabbed that low hanging fruit, but he hasn't pushed or responded to much of what I've said at all since then.

 

All in all, it feels like he's coasting while providing minimum engagement/work and is content to send his vote to what was, at the time, the low hanging fruit.

tldr VOTE VERBAL

Not as in depth as the original, but I'm not letting DM beat me dangit.

I need to do RTE next but... I r tired.

1 hour ago, Lenlo said:

I need to do RTE next but... I r tired.

 

Ok fair enough but first if you see this and I'm gonna ask everyone but just want your take on RTE by itself and solely based on that alone is RTE a Wolf or TWTBAW?

@everyone

 

@dicetosser1

@Shad_

@Cass

@Cairos

@Gudrean

@Verbal32

@HeavyHalfMoonBlade

@Turin Turambar

 

Just want your take on the RTE role fishing by itself and solely based on that alone is RTE a Wolf or TWTBAW?

 

 

2 minutes ago, Zander? said:

 

Ok fair enough but first if you see this and I'm gonna ask everyone but just want your take on RTE by itself and solely based on that alone is RTE a Wolf or TWTBAW?

I personally don't believe in TWTBAW, I think its an excuse often used by people to get out of sticky situations or excuse bad plays.

 

As far as RTE now, prior to rereading, he's the other person on my shortlist atm.  I said it before that I'm a bit biased towards him, as he supported me in our conflict early on, but that could easily have been hedging his bets/buttering me up for when I flipped town. I think us taking a step back, rather than tunneling on each other until the EoD, may have been unexpected for him, because after that is when the vig comment comes out timeline wise I think, and also when he starts to pressure Cairos more.

 

So yeah, I'd rather Verbal over RTE, but I'd be down for either. I'll have deeper thoughts once I reread his stuff

Just now, Lenlo said:

I personally don't believe in TWTBAW, I think its an excuse often used by people to get out of sticky situations or excuse bad plays.

 

As far as RTE now, prior to rereading, he's the other person on my shortlist atm.  I said it before that I'm a bit biased towards him, as he supported me in our conflict early on, but that could easily have been hedging his bets/buttering me up for when I flipped town. I think us taking a step back, rather than tunneling on each other until the EoD, may have been unexpected for him, because after that is when the vig comment comes out timeline wise I think, and also when he starts to pressure Cairos more.

 

So yeah, I'd rather Verbal over RTE, but I'd be down for either. I'll have deeper thoughts once I reread his stuff

 

Ok thanks Len

 

I'll be honest it blows my mind as both alignments lolololol

 

And although I believe in TWTBAW I've been burnt bad on giving a pass for it a couple times and swore I never would again.  I've got Verb sus too fwiw.  But I need a flip or 2 and some Wagonomics before things will start to make any true sense for me but I agree no with Verb or RTE atp unless literally every other player comes with TWTBAW irt RTE I might be a tad tentative atp....maybe lol

Is no one else bothered by the fact that despite their job, Cairos has come back in here and posted several times about how butthurt they are I voted for them yet still haven't provided any reads or anything? 

 

Like what is this blindspot from everyone? Yea they have a really busy job. But then they have come back and posted several times and as dice suggested nothing rings particularly town to me. If anything, really poor responses from someone who's played mafia before and apparently is town. Not to mention he was wolf last game apparently. 

 

I'm not the most empathic person in the world but when did we start giving quiet players a pass because life is busy? If you want to D1 pass them because you like them  so be it but they aren't playing the game

I trust Lenlo because I like the way he plays and his rationale. Verbal is in one of my scum trios and I previously said of those three he was the one I felt scummiest about. I won't change my vote yet but as town I fully intend to try to save myself at deadline and vote someone who, unlike myself, I do not know is town 

I'll just post this in red as apparently no one read it last game but cutey Gudy. 

 

On the profile page there is a "see my activity" button to the right of the message button which will give you all posts (scrollable by page) (up to the last server transfer or whatever) it's also there in the mobile version but is just an icon that looks like the newspaper used "unread content" elsewhere on the site (again to the right of the message button). 

 

You're welcome. Sorry for the red. 

6 minutes ago, ReleaseTheEvil said:

Is no one else bothered by the fact that despite their job, Cairos has come back in here and posted several times about how butthurt they are I voted for them yet still haven't provided any reads or anything? 

 

Like what is this blindspot from everyone? Yea they have a really busy job. But then they have come back and posted several times and as dice suggested nothing rings particularly town to me. If anything, really poor responses from someone who's played mafia before and apparently is town. Not to mention he was wolf last game apparently. 

 

I'm not the most empathic person in the world but when did we start giving quiet players a pass because life is busy? If you want to D1 pass them because you like them  so be it but they aren't playing the game

Do I think Cairos is great? No, not really. And I'll admit I haven't paid as much attention to him as I should have today, being caught up in focusing on Zander/Verbal/Shad. But I have him in a similar camp as Gud atm, which is the "Hasn't really contributed much, but hasn't done anything overtly scummy yet" camp, least in my eyes. Atm I'd rather vote for someone who I legitimately think has a chance to flip wolf and, by virtue of interacting with multiple people, also give us a good amount of information to go off of D2. This also gives Cairos and Gud a chance over the weekend to speak up a bit and do more. If they don't, then yeah, they will move up (Or down I guess?) the wolf list.

1 minute ago, Lenlo said:

Do I think Cairos is great? No, not really. And I'll admit I haven't paid as much attention to him as I should have today, being caught up in focusing on Zander/Verbal/Shad. But I have him in a similar camp as Gud atm, which is the "Hasn't really contributed much, but hasn't done anything overtly scummy yet" camp, least in my eyes. Atm I'd rather vote for someone who I legitimately think has a chance to flip wolf and, by virtue of interacting with multiple people, also give us a good amount of information to go off of D2. This also gives Cairos and Gud a chance over the weekend to speak up a bit and do more. If they don't, then yeah, they will move up (Or down I guess?) the wolf list.

https://media.tenor.com/aFbkxs3TND4AAAAM/okay-fine-valentina.gif

6 minutes ago, ReleaseTheEvil said:

Is no one else bothered by the fact that despite their job, Cairos has come back in here and posted several times about how butthurt they are I voted for them yet still haven't provided any reads or anything? 

 

Like what is this blindspot from everyone? Yea they have a really busy job. But then they have come back and posted several times and as dice suggested nothing rings particularly town to me. If anything, really poor responses from someone who's played mafia before and apparently is town. Not to mention he was wolf last game apparently. 

 

I'm not the most empathic person in the world but when did we start giving quiet players a pass because life is busy? If you want to D1 pass them because you like them  so be it but they aren't playing the game

I don't see what is wolfy about being annoyed that someone is giving you hard time while your struggling to keep up with Zander's written diarrhea. It hardly makes you lock clear but don't quite see how it makes you the most suspicious person in D1. Been there, done that. 

 

And I don't quite agree with the "let's ignore people we think are likely wolves to lynch someone that isn't trying" argument. That seems to be appealing to undermine people's doubts of everyone to go after someone with an objective, undeniable "flaw". Coming from many's favourite lunch menu, it doesn't ring true to me. 

 

Don't really have a read on Cairos apart from he is a bit annoyed. Don't see that as AI. 

2 hours ago, Lenlo said:

  

  Ok I have to speed run this because I lost the original and god I'm annoyed lol.

  Hide contents

Still bothers me, he and everyone else should know that this was a light read for how early in D1 it was, no one was locking both as villagers, just giving out light reads to get the game going. Yet Verb jumps down my throat about it, votes me, accuses me of going for low hanging fruit and then... Never really pushes me or brings me up again? Keep this in mind, because this lack of any real pushing/casing will be relevant later.

 

Some meta/playstyle conversations, keep this in mind as well, as this will become the bulk of his content.

 

Here we get his first, and only, scum list where he lists me and Zander (This is in the middle of our spat) as wolves. No support, no nothing. Me I get, even if his reasoning is bad at least he has a reason and has voted me. But Zander? He hasn't mentioned anything about him at all, but this list seems to imply we are wolves together. He even later clarifies that he added the ??? because there are 3 scum in the game, so he clearly intends this as a list and not a "One or the other", as shown in the quotes below.

This is where things get interesting. This is his first ping against Zander, his first criticism of Zanders play at all, and it comes after he has added Zander to his scum list. So if this is his first  criticism... Why is Zander on the list? Why is he considering Zander a wolf? Again, me I get, even if he's wrong he has a reason. But here, it's like he just took the two people arguing and said "Screw it, both" and started justifying it after. At best it's lazy town, at worst it's a wolf setting up consecutive mislynch targets.

 

This is where we see the reasoning behind it and he lays out his plan for lynching either one of us, he doesnt mention a preference but I assume me since he's voting me, would be nice to see him case/try to push it though if he really believed in it. What's weird to me though is that despite listing us both as scum, he makes no mention of actually trying to... catch scum. Only of the information we will get when one of us flips and we can watch the other, mentioning what may happen if scum are only watching everything go down. Which is weird, because he thinks me and/or Zander are scum... right?

 

Ignore the watcher confusion, that gets clarified later and I don't blame him that mistake, clearly a knowledge check that's all.

 

Talkin about Zander's meta.

 

This is actually a good catch, he's not wrong, we've all acknowledged that the RTE vig thing was weird, so good on him.

 

More meta, figuring out the watcher mistake. Only real bit of substance is he mentions only skimming Zander early in games, but again, he has Zander on his scum list with me so... Is he skimming and wolf reading him? Or did he just pick the two people arguing, not care what they were and decide "Information" was the goal?

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

I moved it into a second spoiler to save space, but man it's just... so much meta/non game talk. Dudes figuring out the watcher role, again, don't blame him for that. But I'd really love to see some casing or pressuring or reinforcing of reads or something. Instead its like hes just coming off busy?

 

 

Brings up the pockets, valid, but again he's considering "If you're town" with Zander, and as we see from the post below that comes after, he's still keeping to his original scum list of me/Zander. What I'm getting at is, I dont think he really believes that list at this point, he only picked the two people butting heads because they were easy/obvious targets, and now it feels like he's kind of hedging his bets.

 

 

Weird hypothetical that he never really gets back to, feels like he's just appearing busy/engaged without really contributing anything. Like what is this for if you're not going to bring it back up/explain why you asked?

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Even more meta and playstyle talk. He's talked more about meta and playstyle and out of game stuff than the actual game. What little of this game he has talked about, he hasn't backed up or supported in any way. He's still sticking to this Zander/Lenlo/??? team, but he acts as though the only thing we will get out of it is information from the lynch/watcher, not actually catching a wolf, like he doesn't actually expect us to. If he did, why would he not case either of us? Not push our lynch? Hell, why not push my lynch, he's certainly been voting me the entire game since he grabbed that low hanging fruit, but he hasn't pushed or responded to much of what I've said at all since then.

 

All in all, it feels like he's coasting while providing minimum engagement/work and is content to send his vote to what was, at the time, the low hanging fruit.

tldr VOTE VERBAL

Agree with this and in some ways feel at fault because I entertained/continued the meta conversation so it let him continue to post about mafia without posting about this game particularly. Too much nostalgia/talking about mafia for mafia's sake without anything substantive about the current game, especially for such an experienced player who says his own meta is based on evidence etc 

3 minutes ago, HeavyHalfMoonBlade said:

I don't see what is wolfy about being annoyed that someone is giving you hard time while your struggling to keep up with Zander's written diarrhea. It hardly makes you lock clear but don't quite see how it makes you the most suspicious person in D1. Been there, done that. 

 

And I don't quite agree with the "let's ignore people we think are likely wolves to lynch someone that isn't trying" argument. That seems to be appealing to undermine people's doubts of everyone to go after someone with an objective, undeniable "flaw". Coming from many's favourite lunch menu, it doesn't ring true to me. 

 

Don't really have a read on Cairos apart from he is a bit annoyed. Don't see that as AI. 

Ah experienced player shouldn't even be annoyed when someone votes them, especially for something like inactivity/not contributing to the game that they can change. 

 

They then magically found time to post several times, none particularly helpful to the game besides RTE bad. 

I know I literally shot myself in the foot but letting people like Cairos (I think at this point the quietest player here) just slip through because they were busy and can only be bothered to post at the one person who voted them is at least giving me a message. 

 

Next game just post less, explain why you're busy due to your important and empathic job, and just keep a low profile and don't engage with anything. That's what I try to do as scum but if I played mafia again then at least Day 1 ill do the same 🤷 there's no repercussions anyways. This was much easier to do too in games with 20+ people. 

Humour me, what's town's plan for D2 after I flip town and mafia kill Zander or Cass? 

8 minutes ago, ReleaseTheEvil said:

Humour me, what's town's plan for D2 after I flip town and mafia kill Zander or Cass? 

As opposed to what is the plan when Cairos flips either way that tells us nothing as if he flips town you were only voting for him as he was quiet and a bad player, and if he flips wolf he tells us nothing about any player interactions. For someone who is wanting an informative flip, Cairos seems a bad target. 

 

Why Zander or Cass? Why not Shad or Dice? Meh, you may just be trying to save your skin with either alignment but I don't like it. I don't like it one bit. 

1 minute ago, HeavyHalfMoonBlade said:

As opposed to what is the plan when Cairos flips either way that tells us nothing as if he flips town you were only voting for him as he was quiet and a bad player, and if he flips wolf he tells us nothing about any player interactions. For someone who is wanting an informative flip, Cairos seems a bad target. 

 

Why Zander or Cass? Why not Shad or Dice? Meh, you may just be trying to save your skin with either alignment but I don't like it. I don't like it one bit. 

Shad and Dice have more suspicion and feel less firm town than Zander and to some extent Cass have so far. Also getting rid of a town Cass at this point would hinder a town Zander because I think Zander trusts her now. 

 

To your first point, I'm biased but as town I'd rather lose Cairos who's not playing to me who is playing (albeit not super intelligently at times) if we both are town. The fact that Cairos flip would not help us if they were town is testament to the fact that he hasn't done enough to have meaningful interactions with other players that we can learn anything from. 

 

I also have said that D1 Lynch is largely guesswork so as I said when Zander's posting was all over the place (which actually has drastically improved, thanks Zander, makes playing altogether much easier), getting rid of someone obstructive to town, irrespective of alignment, is still a good outcome for D1 Lynch 

@Ithillian Turambar can we get a vote count pls BTW? May have missed last one 😊

Official Vote Count

 

ZANDER - 1 (Heavy)

LENLO - 1 (Verbal)

RTE - 2 (Dice, Zander)

VERBAL - 3 (Cass, Shad, Lenlo)

CAIROS - 1 (RTE)

 

Not Voting: Cairos, Gudrean, Turin

 

You must Unvote before you can Vote again.

 

Day 1 will end 10pm GMT Friday 14 March.

 

D1 Timer

 

https://stagetimer.io/r/UVDHPDFH/

 

This is a Deadline Game. This means whoever has the most votes at Deadline will be Lynched. Don't be shouting at me to do multi vote counts. If there is a Tie, RandomOrg will decide. It's in your interest to not leave Lynches up to chance.