Lenz's law states that the direction of any induced current is in a direction that opposes the flux change that causes it.

Magnetic flux density (B) - F = BILsin(theta)

 

F = force

L = length of wire

I = current

theta = angle to field

 

flux capacitor?

 

No, just in terms of magnetic fields n shtuff. Capacitors is separate thankfully :)

 

Wait wait, flux capacitors actually exist?

Magnetic flux density (B) - F = BILsin(theta)

 

F = force

L = length of wire

I = current

theta = angle to field

 

flux capacitor?

 

No, just in terms of magnetic fields n shtuff. Capacitors is separate thankfully :)

 

Wait wait, flux capacitors actually exist?

 

Unfortunately not (that I'm aware of...)

Capacitance is defined as the charge stored per unit potential difference

Magnetic flux density (B) - F = BILsin(theta)

 

F = force

L = length of wire

I = current

theta = angle to field

 

flux capacitor?

 

No, just in terms of magnetic fields n shtuff. Capacitors is separate thankfully :)

 

Wait wait, flux capacitors actually exist?

 

Unfortunately not (that I'm aware of...)

 

That's unfortunate, I had hope for a second there

Its unit is the Farad

Capacitance is defined as the charge stored per unit potential difference

 

not time travel?

 

illusion = well and truly shattered

Magnetic flux density (B) - F = BILsin(theta)

 

F = force

L = length of wire

I = current

theta = angle to field

 

flux capacitor?

 

No, just in terms of magnetic fields n shtuff. Capacitors is separate thankfully :)

 

Wait wait, flux capacitors actually exist?

 

Unfortunately not (that I'm aware of...)

 

That's unfortunate, I had hope for a second there

 

You could just invent something and call it a flux capacitor if you like :)

Capacitance is defined as the charge stored per unit potential difference

 

not time travel?

 

illusion = well and truly shattered

 

Nooo

 

*gets Roo a hoverboard*

Magnetic flux density (B) - F = BILsin(theta)

 

F = force

L = length of wire

I = current

theta = angle to field

 

flux capacitor?

 

No, just in terms of magnetic fields n shtuff. Capacitors is separate thankfully :)

 

Wait wait, flux capacitors actually exist?

 

Unfortunately not (that I'm aware of...)

 

That's unfortunate, I had hope for a second there

 

You could just invent something and call it a flux capacitor if you like :)

 

I don't have a Delorean handy

 

I am assuming you have seen Back to the Future

The time constant of a circuit containing a capacitor of capacitance C and a resistor of resistance R is given by CR

Edited May 14, 201213 yr by Crimson_Ayla

evidently you have, that's good

Capacitance is defined as the charge stored per unit potential difference

 

not time travel?

 

illusion = well and truly shattered

 

Nooo

 

*gets Roo a hoverboard*

 

We're supposed to have them by 2015... time's ticking inventor people!

Yesh, I have :)

 

*gets all inventing like*

...

 

 

*le ominous splosion*

 

>.>

A nucleon is a nuclear particle; a proton or a neutron

The nucleon number is the number of nucleons in any nucleus

The proton number is the number of protons in a nucleus

Two nuclides with the same number of protons but different numbers of neutrons are isotopes

The rate at which a source emits radioactive particles its called its activity

An activity of 1 particle emitted per second is called a becquerel, Bq

The decay constant relates activity A to the number of nuclei N by the equation A = (lambda)N

one day when i came home at lunchtime,

i heard a funny noise

went out to the back yard to find out if it was,

one of those rowdy boys.

stood there with my neighbour called peter,

and a Flux Capacitor.

 

he told me he built a time machine

like the one in a film i've seen,

yeah yeah... he said...

 

[Chorus:]

i've been to the year three thousand

not much has changed but they lived under water,

and your great great great grand daughter,

is pretty fine (is pretty fine)

have you combined spamming and revision?

The half life of a radioactive source is the time taken for the activity of the source to decrease by one half. It is also the time taken for the number of radioactive nuclei to decrease by one half.