Jump to content

Darthe

Member
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Darthe

  1. Always strikes me as pandering. Probably NAI but given my thoughts on the slot… 🙂 gotta hit the road to Atlanta, should be more available this evening!
  2. This is a ton of fluff and still utterly misses the point. You chose talking mechanics to the new player over actually contributing substance, and are still mad that I called you on it. youre also diving on the concept that my lack of a town read doesn’t constitute enough to consider you wolfy. Less than 20 pages into D1 why would it have to? Getting bent out of shape by it was more telling. you’re also self admittedly crafting your sentences, but expect me to not highlight when I see the artifice in how you chose your words. see the contradiction? This response is basically a self reveal. GG, sorry you didn’t make it past D1. also I feel copied. I made both the were-withal and the great interest jokes.
  3. That vote won't do much on its own. Show me more.
  4. I don't get the key read at all DPR. Do wonder where she went though.
  5. Yeah he's got a real polished way of writing. Part of his charm. Wes, I do like our back-and-forth's but I haven't gotten much of one here. I want to say that's townie, but agreed it has been too long.
  6. No, no, I get his point, and I don't think he's got a read from it. He's questioning why I am approaching the game in a way that's somewhat inconsistent with my stated goal. It's a fair question, but there are two factors to the answer. One of them will be perceived as less townie though it isn't, but I'ma give both factors anyhow. First, because you hunt from both ends. My town core is shaping up nice. Zander, Key, Seph (perhaps). We're gettin there. Finding suspects is just as good as finding clear villagers or better. Second, because inconsistency is part of being a person. I slept, or had a bad meeting, or something between one thought and the next. It doesn't really need an explanation usually.
  7. Do I feel one way or another about myself/turin? yeah man. Yeah. and as for the “stirring the pot”, same answer as my answer to key about DPR. He’s not where I’m focused.
  8. Yeah that’ll do it. Jeeze the amount of inane garbage that comes across my desk from engineers who’ve never touched the products theyre solving for.
  9. This seems wildly out of proportion to what I’ve said. Put yourself in my shoes Turin. How am I supposed to interpret this?
  10. I can’t do quotes rn but when I read up I respond to individual posts as if I were in the moment. Seph is like organizing charts and tracking his own thoughts from one blog to the next. I think it’s townie, but I don’t have a meta to say if he does it in either alignment.
  11. And now I’m confused
  12. That is a lot of words to say very little to address any of what I said. And dismissing it as “reasons”? It’s real clear, your engagement is off. I’m betting that last game tired you out and now you’re forcing yourself to carry along in a W role you didn’t want. vote turin
  13. Is seph always so methodical? DPR not standing out to me yet. verb I’m still waiting to see you engage more… slanking?
  14. Ok so I held off on responding to Cass through that. @cass I talked earlier in the thread about my read when I voted him I think, should’ve had to do with the last sentence of the post I quoted. I also answered above. That said… this reeks of offensive defense. Whats he done that you are so confident in your read of him that you can question me off of it?
  15. This is your best post fwiw
  16. Thats fine, I think many of us are there with ya. Those reads though, they lead to follow ups. Show your work as you move them around, etc. I’m particularly keen on why you weigh 1 thing over another when determining the order of your reads, so that kinda info would be what I’d wanna see.
  17. Sometimes LeBron doesn’t get a call other players would’ve. I too struggle with greatness. what are your thought irt Cass?
  18. Why? If you disagree then explore that more or explain your stance better or something. Isn’t that the game? fwiw, I think this is NAI, just generally chatting about the philosophy of it
  19. See like this is the kinda thing I’m talking about. The positioning of this is such that any effort I make to lynch you, whether you think it’s real or artificial, you can point back and act like there’s some motive behind it. If this is town play it’s -ev, and if it’s wolf play then I get the sense you want the confrontation.
  20. More like *ware*withal amirite? No but for real, that’s a good internalization. If this is a pocket attempt it’s got layers.
  21. 🙂 couldn’t resist sorry
  22. You’re a talented player but you’re spending your time posting by and large about mechanics. You’re playing seriously, but not sharing serious reads or insights. Beyond that, gut feel says your sentences seem overly constructed. these are dumb reasons which all have caveats, but I’d expect myself to have a stronger town read on you by now. It’s the same issue I had with Zander though so *shrug*