Verbal32

Literally my 2nd favorite role, the 1st being solo SK.

The answer to all those questions is yes. Especially the lolPac.

This is why I wouldn't fight Zander if he wanted to move forward with his plan of lynching my counterwagon from D1.

On JN that's been me multiple times. I get blind lynched all the time, especially when I have a power role, heh. I recall coming back to the thread and being ready to flip tables. They loved it and I learned to love it because of the culture there. But man, I was heated!

RTE - It's specifically used to alter votes and sway reads. It's gross (imo) when accompanied by a mention of RL issues or self-votes. When done without realizing the implications, it can be forgiven from my POV, but not when done intentionally (also just imo).

I laugh because I don't want to cry.

I don't find it stupid at all; otherwise, I'd be a complete hypocrite as you noted my own "policy". No worries, you're absolutely fine. I mean, I might still lynch you, but you'll be fine hanging there. 😉

Is the Ape dead yet? /JN'd

Ok nevermind, you clarified. You thought she changed something, she didn't, you're fine. We good, folks.

@Lenlo Dude, I'm completely lost here. I didn't think she changed a word, you confirmed that, so did Ithi, but you're still saying a change was made. What am I missing? I want to respect your wishes on something that bothers you, but I can't figure out what was wrong.

That I can promise.

Not a problem. I'll just cut up the quotes instead for you. It might remove some context, but that's better than going against your personal wishes. All good.

I see what you did there and I cackled out loud. ❤️

Then my apologies for doing it to almost everybody this game. I bold lines to then respond to them while keeping the rest of the quote for context all the time. If that's not ok, let me know and I'll find another way.

I'm torn on your (completely legit and logical) plan to lynch the counter wagon to me from D1 and the crashout RTE had that screams town to me. It is close-ish to the situation I had on JN where I was sussing a player that then had a meltdown and self voted. I backed off and it turns out he was faking it all and was scum. If you feel the need to follow through on your legit and logical plan, you'll get no argument from me.

Is the bold the only change she made?

We can't take the time to policy lynch anybody who got upset and/or self-voted. A line needs to be drawn and followed. I think in most cases what RTE did comes from a townie and not scum. I know that's part of my own policy, but it's where I'm drawing a line. Heavy sorta falls in there, too, but is a new player so I am trying to be more loose in my interpretation there.

Yeah, there is pretty much no way Lenlo and Heavy are both scum. One can be, but not both.

I'm trying to consider if scum!Lenlo would be hard defending a teammate here or not. It's been too long, I have no idea.

Please, if you don't mind, post a concise case on why you think Dice could be scum. Try to keep it short and sweet.

I never said Heavy is ok to go for, just that I'm considering still based on the null read post as I find that super scummy. That's all.

If a townie sees a confirmed townie confident in a solve, is sheeping them an awful decision?

It was my reaction to gameplay. You can't count it as AtE because the whole point of AtE is to sway votes. I'm already cleared. So it's just my little bit of frustration, yes. So IMO it is meaningfully different, but you are free to disagree and that's cool.

You have a very sharp wit, I love it.

I don't have a specific Dice read, I'm sheeping Zander on it as he's also confirmed town. And just look at POE options, it's not crazy to have him in there. Or Turin. Or you.