HeavyHalfMoonBlade

Such a wolf. Don't buy this dropping of Cairos and jumping on me. Maybe I'm biased but not buying it at all. UNVOTE VOTE TURIN

Sorry for all the typos.

I think everyone has been remarkably non-wolfy since the opening exchanges (that is Gud, Sooh, Cairos, Mills, Andy) except for the silent Don, the Zanderish Zander, and you (Turin) and Dice. Maybe be a use they have backed off whereas you guys have continued hounding suspicions. One thing to consider if someone flips town, what does that tell us? If Turin (you) flips town, that would implicate a few people. If Cairos flips town, there are a few that would look a bit shady. If Zander flipped town would I look bad? What would lynching Mills tell us? I'm kinda worn out now. Having suspicions of a townie does not make you mafia. We need to see patterns and we time to see them. Am I confusing activity with suspicion? I don't know any more but I don't trust any of you. Plus I have base line of behaviour on any of you. Don and Andy are both new here, and you fossils I don't know from Larry. No offence meant. Maybe we should lynch one of the most active people, as then at least we would have a large body of definitely town or mafia reasoning to examine. Or maybe we should save them for when the stakes are higher. Can you lynch yourself? Then I would get some peace and you would know I was coming from a genuine place, lol. Sweet Jeebus, this is an exhausting game.

Ok that is glib. Not convincing but given the context it couldn't be. But if we were going to Lynch, wouldn't it be better just to get it over with? All this changing votes and bringing up alternate theories is only muddying the waters so if someone flips town, everyone will have accused everyone a few times and changed their mind and saved the vote and so on so it will be a flaming mess to see who really instigated what. At this point, I don't trust any of you and Andy is making the most sense logically. Which probably means about as much as who is using the funniest memes at this point.

No I was cleverly asking Turin about his own behaviour in the third person to establish both how suspicious it is and how threadbare the trust is around here. But by all means let's have your opinion as well. Let's see how wolfy you sound in your tunnel vision on Cairos.

Can we not just Lynch everyone (still not used to seeing my name plastered everywhere) and let the Gods sort us out. Might be a blessing in the long run.

How is it possible you are all acting so suspicious?

So. Turin. What's I'd your read on the fact that Turin has been pushing Cairos since the Zander lock clear meme, and immediately after I point out that if Cairos flips town, Turin will be pretty deeply incriminated, he unvotes and starts sounding out a different "train", is that the right term? Could you as an experienced wolf, sorry, player, talk us through these machinations?

This is sus. You aren't making an argument against me but still casting shade. 100% wolf behaviour. If I die note this well.

I did have my suspicions of Cairos at the beginning but I would rather lynch Mills or Zander. So many people voting for Cairos makes me suspicious of the voters. *sighs* But I guess we need to have a lynching to see how things lie. No rush yet to change my vote. If Cairos flips town, who is incriminated? Zander for marking him early doors? Turin for casting suspicion on Cairos because of Zander's post yet voting for Cairos and not Zander? Both of them? Part of some wolf dream team? You can really think round in circles in this game.

If you mean the Social Groups, or Orgs, or whatever they were called in your time signing here would be a good start. The White Tower is the most active group these days though things are heating up thanks to the show starting again and a few oldtimers have come back to play a game of mafia.

I cannot see the original post that made me think Dice was overreacting (allegedly) to Zander. Here though we can see him not denying his suspicion but rationalising it So tricky. You are all sus. I think Mills is flying a bit under the radar. He seemed a bit too keen to latch onto "towniest of townies", a bit too keen to back up a Turin vote, a little bit too quiet (though real life obviously way more important, even for a wolf). And Donchadh also backed up Turin vote without adding to the vote themselves. Not sure about Cairos. Some red flags, but some based on other people's behaviour other than his own. And everyone wants to believe Sooh. That reasonable voice, gentle humour, the way she intelligently sees there is nothing sus about the way I'm playing - or she knows for certain I'm town therefore can easily back me up for town brownie points. Until people start to reacting to who dies, who gets lynched, etc, this is all a big nothing burger imo.

I'm talking about Turin and Dice being so suspicious of Zander's memes in the first ten minutes of the game. I get we don't have a lot to go at that point, but shoildnt we be reserving judgement until we see a pattern? That said Zander did choose those memes and subjects deliberately so...

Have to say you are all tots sus. Like really. All this cloak and dagger stuff is driving me insane. Andy actually makes the most sense, but that just goes to show how any group of players could wolves. But yes, why is Zander being Zander such a red flag to players that have so often played with him. Are they in cahoots or is Zander an incredibly suspicious dupe in all this? Just to clear a point about me seeing old posts, this was posts not threads. Finding the most recent posts involved simply looking at the users activity where I could only see their posts, not the conversation. I also had to look for the last roll call they made so that involved scrolling a bit through their activity. So lots of talk about mafia, not a lot of coherent sense. It is so frustrating as wolves don't need to do anything different from town. They can throw suspicion on each other, especially on day 1, as who takes that seriously? The only time we really see their intent is who dies, but again is that the most accurate townie or a bluff or a double bluff? Is Dice pushing for Cairos sus? Turin backing him up, based on posts Zander made? Andy hasn't explained why she voted for Turin early, not directly even though she has substantiated a very good reason to be suspicious of him. But anyone pointing out suspicious things is suspicious. What do they want us to think? Personally I think you all did it and I'm the only town, lol. Sticking with Zander for now.

It is very late for me now. I am heading to the scratcher. It has been fun. Don't let Zander eat anyone while I'm away.

Methinks the lady doth protest too much. Its almost like you are town and want me to think you are mafia, but that wouldn't make sense. I asked the question here and clearly got an answer. I am a clever little Accepted so I can figure hypotheticals out without needing to have played before. You are acting as sus as a wolf with a ball of cotton wool on its head saying "baaa" trying to get into a sheep only bar.

At the moment Zander I am surprised your little wolf paws can hold that shovel so well that you are digging that hole deeper with. To an extent my suspicions revolve around other players reactions your moves. So that could leave you innocent. But it is almost as if you are doing everything to double down on your first reactions rather than reacting to the *many* people that have backed you up on Turin without voting. Or, in Andy's case, with voting for little reason. If you are Mafia, you know I am not... Course, maybe Zander and Turin are deliberately trying to split into two camps so that if one gets flipped no one will suspect the other. Has anyone ever seen them together in the same room? Do we even know they are not the same person? Has anyone considered that? Could be you are innocent and say, Mills, Cairos and Andy are leeching off your early vote. But why are you not suspicious of them but of Turin, Dice and me?

Lock clear means absolutely definitely not mafia.

Does this post not sound a little nervous? Maybe I am making the wrong connection but this seems a fairly strange take on someone voting for Zander. Feeling fairly vindicated so far but time will tell. So Zander, given you voted for Turin before anything had happened what is your take now? Who do you not trust, aside from the person voting for you, obviously. Lay your wisdom on us.

That is so sus I am thinking of changing my vote to its poster...

Like flipping over a face down card in board game to see if it was Col Mustard after all (sus moustache is sus).

That is kinda the way I am thinking as well. (Zander, Andy, Cairos) though it is a pretty vague suspicion and they are not necessarily all guilty if one is. BUT it would also be pretty hilarious if Zander was right and you were Mafia and controlling the chat.

Me, Andy and Donchadh. Did Gudrean also say she was a first timer?

Definitely don't think anyone is lock clear yet. Not by a long shot.

Meh. Donchadh, Gudrean and Sooh have been very quiet and not accused. So if they were wolves they would not need to do anything. Turin, Dice, Zander and me, I guess, have vocal in being detecting townies, hut could be running interference on purpose. Zander perhaps more throwing memes about than detecting. Andy, Cairos and Mills have been quietish and encouraging some suspicions, with little backing. Well maybe Mills does but he is wrong about me. Congrats, Sooh.