If he already proved it, why do you want to prove it again? What does that prove?

That I CAN prove it.

But if it's already been proven, do you plan on proving it a different way? Why is it so difficult to prove? And what does the equation itself say that we should be trying to prove it?

No, I don't know if that's even possible.

 

It just IS.

 

(-b + (or minus) radical b² + 4ac)/2a

 

When the equation is in the form ax² + bx + c

But why do we want to prove it? What does the equation prove?

For fun.

 

It's for solving certain equations.

It's an equation to solve equations? I am WAY out of my league.

I guess so.

 

*licks a speaker*

yeah he is unique and yes you can prove it

*proves quadratic equation*

my teacher told the class this song (tune of pop goes the weasel)

x equals oposite B

plus or minus the squaaare root

of B squared minus 4AC

all over 2A

 

Before you ask, its because i can.

LOL... :)

*proves quadratic equation*

my teacher told the class this song (tune of pop goes the weasel)

x equals oposite B

plus or minus the squaaare root

of B squared minus 4AC

all over 2A

 

Before you ask, its because i can.

Hey, I know that song!  My brother's math teacher taught it to him and he tought it to me. ;D

YAYS

That isn't a proof though that is just the singing of the quadratic formula, and back in my day we didn't get to sing it with a song. :P

Yes, we know. :P

 

 

 

Here you go, you are welcome.