hate people replacing in when dead. Let's kill him again.

he was VT and he's caught up with the game. there's no reason he shouldn't replace and it's hard to get subs.

There is, actually. He has an established in game meta already.

 

But never mind my jokes.

Look what you guys did discussing calculus, semitics, probability, quantum theory etc

 

Now I am back!

Yeah, I hate giving players second lives.

welcome back pray

 

btw I choose pray over pral not only cause I prefer it, but bc autocorrect makes pral oral.

 

interestingly it makes prsl pralaya.

 

maybe I should just go with rory.

 

Damn, I need to change my name , lol

Yeah, I hate giving players second lives.

*Hides a green mushroom*

 

 

Look what you guys did discussing calculus, semitics, probability, quantum theory etc

 

Now I am back!

We had fun with science!

Look what you guys did discussing calculus, semitics, probability, quantum theory etc

 

Now I am back!

Thanks for your numbers btw. The Roman ones sucked.

Oh man we can do quantam. Mafia is filled with quantam.

I don't know what this here quantum nonsense is all about but I can tell you for sure the cat is not both dead and alive just bc it's in a box any more than the tortoise wins the race w Achilles.

You can't know that though. If we use the logic that if you aren't right I can't be wrong then it works.

just because I can't know it doesn't mean both are true.

 

they are mutually exclusive states.

 

it's not about right or wrong, death in this example is objective.

 

it's a one or a zero, it's not both.

 

also, it's really mean to poison a cat. srsly.

and... I read a lot of games and this one is the weirdest ever.

 

I blame the CoC for limiting the discussion.

I would point out that Schrodingers cat is a principal based in the idea that ignorance forces assumptions, so you must assume all options or risk failure.

 

You've never poisoned a cat?

not on purpose.

 

as god is my witness, I could have sworn 7 week old kittens couldn't get to the top of the fridge and I didn't know philodendrons were poison anyway.

 

schrodinger (sp?) was a sadist of a thought experimenter, and fine concluding one can't assume but taking it as a literal truth when it can't be is silly.

Schrödinger didn't actually believe that. He was trying to demonstrate the absurdity of certain aspects of quantum mechanics. A cat is a macroscopic system anyways, and therefore, quantum effects are insignificant to it. And yeah, I always found that thought experiment to be way too morbid. Sounds like something a James Bond villian would do.

Quantum superpositions are totally valid for subatomic particles though. The idea that a particle has to be in one state or another has been disproved by experimental data.

nice ümlat....

and no matter how many times I look at that post it still read as suppositories to me.

Particle? Hmmmph. More like strings

wibbly wobbly timey wimey stuff

Particle? Hmmmph. More like strings

Possibly, but we have yet to find a good test for such ideas.

This night is taking too long. I really hope they don't all go the full length.

if it god full length tho, well not stagger the DL back to a really difficult time.

 

tho I'm not sure there's a time good for everyone anyway.

got.....

 

it's ok, it's not blasphemy cause it's a little g.